Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

crypto fraud case
crypto fraud case

Cryptocurrency

A US judge has temporarily blocked Arkansas from enforcing laws on cryptocurrency miners

A federal judge has temporarily blocked Arkansas from implementing rules against foreign-owned crypto mining operations, siding with a naturalized US citizen accused of breaking the laws.

A federal judge in Little Rock, Arkansas, has temporarily blocked the execution of two state laws that limit foreign ownership of land and digital asset mining enterprises. The decision came after Jones Eagle LLC, a bitcoin mining firm, challenged the laws on constitutional grounds.

Qimin “Jimmy” Chen, the company’s principal owner and a naturalized US citizen of Chinese origin, filed the complaint after Arkansas officials attempted to shut down his business. The state claimed that Chen’s ownership violated Acts 636 and 174, which prohibit persons and corporations affiliated with foreign countries, primarily China, from holding property or operating digital mining facilities in Arkansas.

Chen claimed that the legislation unfairly discriminated against him based on his national origin. Chief U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker agreed to temporarily suspend the execution of the statutes, noting probable irreparable injury to Chen’s business and image. After 14 days, a hearing will determine whether to extend the restraining order.

Chen’s attorney, Alex Jones, applauded the judge’s ruling, adding that it will let his client continue functioning while preparing to challenge the regulations as illegal. The lawsuit claims that Chen provided documents demonstrating his adherence to state standards and tried to clarify his citizenship status with Arkansas officials, but they refused to meet.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the governor of Arkansas, stated that she intends to appeal the verdict, arguing that the rules are required to safeguard the state from foreign influence. The public’s growing concern about foreign espionage led to the passage of Act 636 in particular.

The court battle highlights the contradiction between state restrictions and constitutional safeguards, particularly in companies such as cryptocurrency, which operate in a worldwide market. The decision in the lawsuit may have far-reaching repercussions for how governments deal with foreign ownership of new technologies.

author avatar
Sagar Saini
A dedicated freelance blogger with a strong passion for finance and business, With a keen interest in the world of cryptocurrency.
Advertisement

You May Also Like

Cryptocurrency

Ripple will debut its new dollar-backed stablecoin, RLUSD, on December 17, with initial listings on major platforms including Uphold, MoonPay, and CoinMENA. The stablecoin...

Finance

Lido Finance has discontinued its staking services on the Polygon network, citing limited user acceptance and shifting market circumstances. Users may withdraw their staked...

Business

Chrystia Freeland resigned as Canada's finance minister due to differences with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and economic challenges from US tariffs. Her resignation raises...

Cryptocurrency

President Joe Biden supports a prohibition on stock trading for members of Congress, citing potential conflicts of interest. This idea seeks to ensure that...

polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 6.77 2.55%
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 94,474.31 2.25%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,271.47 1.99%
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.878947 1.85%
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 2.16 3.07%
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.352471 0.32%
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 100.23 0.10%