Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

OpenSea
OpenSea

Business

OpenSea users withdraw their securities lawsuit following an arbitration demand

Two OpenSea consumers dropped their complaint against the NFT marketplace for selling unregistered securities after the court upheld OpenSea’s arbitration requirement. The ruling shows the marketplace’s approach to dispute resolution and the difficulty of regulating NFTs as securities.

Two OpenSea users dropped their complaint accusing the NFT marketplace of selling unregistered securities. This ruling came after a federal judge ruled in favor of Open Sea’s demand for arbitration, effectively halting the lawsuit.

On November 7, plaintiffs Anthony Shnayderman and Itai Bronshtein filed a voluntary dismissal motion against Ozone Networks, the firm that operates as OpenSea. Since the users had consented to OpenSea’s terms of service, which require resolution of disagreements outside of court, the court verdict in October permitted OpenSea to compel arbitration.

According to court records, OpenSea’s terms of service compel users to settle any legal disputes with JAMS, an arbitration company. In an earlier petition, OpenSea stated that if the court did not enforce arbitration, it would file an appeal, potentially postponing the case forever.

Adam Moskowitz, the plaintiffs’ attorney, expressed displeasure in the dismissal. He stated that the fundamental goal of the case was to create a framework for NFT marketplaces to function in a regulated, global context. Moskowitz declared that his firm would persist in exploring strategies to support NFT customers impacted by the industry’s growing problems, even after the case’s withdrawal.

Shnayderman and Bronshtein filed the initial lawsuit in September, claiming that the NFTs they purchased on OpenSea were unregistered securities under US law, rendering them virtually worthless due to their regulatory status. The lawsuit cited a previous Wells notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to OpenSea, indicating probable enforcement action regarding unregistered securities transactions.

The lawsuit asserted that OpenSea should have monitored its platform to stop the trade of unregistered securities, citing prior SEC actions against NFT projects that were considered securities.

In response to these charges, an OpenSea spokeswoman called the lawsuit’s assertions “baseless.” They claimed that targeting OpenSea’s business unfairly and citing an SEC letter as the basis for a class-action lawsuit was unfounded.

The case’s decision underscores the intricate legal framework that surrounds NFTs and the ongoing debate over their classification as securities. As regulatory agencies monitor the NFT sector, organizations like OpenSea may face more pressure to assure compliance while preserving customer trust.

Advertisement

You May Also Like

Cryptocurrency

The Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) recently issued a public warning about Crypto.com's operations, citing potential regulatory violations. This advisory, while not an outright...

Business

WalletConnect Foundation and Reown have announced new UX standards for blockchain wallets to improve interactions and increase adoption. Through WalletGuide and WalletConnect Certified, they...

Cryptocurrency

Beginning in mid-2025, Detroit citizens will be able to pay taxes and local fees using bitcoin, as part of a new drive to modernize...

Cryptocurrency

In this week's Crypto Chronicle, we explore the potential impact of Donald Trump's presidential victory on the crypto world, Elon Musk's massive $20 billion...

polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 5.02 1.88%
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 89,935.10 2.88%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,202.28 0.85%
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.570093 4.90%
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.696221 2.07%
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.122675 5.49%
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 75.03 0.75%