Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uk judge
Uk judge

Cryptocurrency

The court has rejected the $770 million Bitcoin hard drive recovery case

James Howells, an early Bitcoin enthusiast, has lost his decade-long legal struggle to retrieve a hard drive containing $770 million worth of Bitcoin after a UK judge ruled that there is no reasonable likelihood of success. Due to environmental regulations, the internal drive remains buried in a Newport landfill, forcing Howells to seek alternative ways to commercialize his digital assets.

James Howells, an IT engineer from Newport, Wales, experienced a big setback in his attempt to reclaim a lost Bitcoin fortune. A UK judge dismissed his legal attempt to search a landfill for a hard disk containing more than $770 million in Bitcoin. The decision found “no realistic prospect” of success at trial, essentially terminating Howells’ 12-year legal battle.

The hard drive, which contained 8,000 Bitcoin mined in 2009, was unintentionally dumped in 2013, when Bitcoin was valued at $13. Since then, the cryptocurrency’s value has surged by nearly 704,000 times. However, environmental regulations have prevented Howells from accessing the dump where the drive is believed to be located.

Despite various strategies, such as offering a portion of the recovered Bitcoin’s value, the Newport City Council has consistently rejected Howells’ requests, citing environmental concerns. The council maintains that excavation would cause severe damage to the surrounding environment, rendering it impossible under their current permissions.

Howells has claimed that the council violated environmental rules, citing evidence of landfill permit violations, such as the release of dangerous pollutants into the local ecosystem. However, these allegations have not influenced the council’s or the court’s ruling.

While the court confirmed Howells’ ownership of the Bitcoin, it provided little relief. He now intends to investigate alternate ways to commercialize his digital assets, including potential tokenization strategies.

This case serves as a cautionary tale for cryptocurrency investors, underlining the significance of safeguarding digital assets and the difficulties of regaining lost sums in an ever-changing legislative context.

author avatar
Alex
Formally freelance blogger Alex is passionate writer with interest in Finance and Business, fascinated about crypto following news and covering stories.
Advertisement

You May Also Like

Cryptocurrency

In a significant turn for the cryptocurrency industry, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is no longer moving forward with its inquiry into...

Cryptocurrency

As the number of crypto fraud scams has increased in recent times, investors must stay vigilant and acquire the skills to spot these scams...

Cryptocurrency

Though European banks are unable to keep up with the demand, the crypto market is attracting more attention these days. Though consumer and business...

Cryptocurrency

A court has tentatively lifted the three-month ban on Upbit, the largest digital asset exchange in South Korea, marking a significant development for the...

polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 4.10 0.14%
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 84,507.64 1.69%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 1,878.78 2.22%
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.673769 0.54%
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 2.10 0.31%
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.268188 0.86%
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 82.79 1.50%